[Python-ideas] Support parsing stream with `re`
ned at nedbatchelder.com
Sat Oct 6 11:57:35 EDT 2018
On 10/6/18 7:25 AM, Ram Rachum wrote:
> "This is a regular expression problem, rather than a Python problem."
> Do you have evidence for this assertion, except that other regex
> implementations have this limitation? Is there a regex specification
> somewhere that specifies that streams aren't supported? Is there a
> fundamental reason that streams aren't supported?
> "Can the lexing be done on a line-by-line basis?"
> For my use case, it unfortunately can't.
You mentioned earlier that your use case doesn't have to worry about the
"a.*b" problem. Can you tell us more about your scenario? How would
the stream know it had read enough to match or not match? Perhaps that
same logic can be used to feed the data in chunks?
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 1:53 PM Jonathan Fine <jfine2358 at gmail.com
> <mailto:jfine2358 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi Ram
> You wrote:
> > I'd like to use the re module to parse a long text file, 1GB in
> size. I
> > wish that the re module could parse a stream, so I wouldn't have
> to load
> > the whole thing into memory. I'd like to iterate over matches
> from the
> > stream without keeping the old matches and input in RAM.
> This is a regular expression problem, rather than a Python
> problem. A search for
> regular expression large file
> brings up some URLs that might help you, starting with
> This might also be helpful
> What will work for your problem depends on the nature of the problem
> you have. The simplest thing that might work is to iterate of the file
> line-by-line, and use a regular expression to extract matches from
> each line.
> In other words, something like (not tested)
> def helper(lines):
> for line in lines:
> yield from re.finditer(pattern, line)
> lines = open('my-big-file.txt')
> for match in helper(lines):
> # Do your stuff here
> Parsing is not the same as lexing, see
> I suggest you use regular expressions ONLY for the lexing phase. If
> you'd like further help, perhaps first ask yourself this. Can the
> lexing be done on a line-by-line basis? And if not, why not?
> If line-by-line not possible, then you'll have to modify the helper.
> At the end of each line, they'll be a residue / remainder, which
> you'll have to bring into the next line. In other words, the helper
> will have to record (and change) the state that exists at the end of
> each line. A bit like the 'carry' that is used when doing long
> I hope this helps.
> Python-ideas mailing list
> Python-ideas at python.org
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Python-ideas