[Python-ideas] Keyword only argument on function call

Steven D'Aprano steve at pearwood.info
Wed Sep 12 11:38:08 EDT 2018


On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 03:58:25PM +0100, Jonathan Fine wrote:

> My question is about correctly implementing of __params__ as a keyword
> identifier, with semantics as in Steve B's code snippet above.

The semantics of Steve's code snippet are ambiguous.


> Here's my question: Do you think implementing this requires the
> avoidance of a race hazard? 

I don't know what "this" is any more. I thought Steve wanted an 
externally accessible fn.__params__ dict, as that's what he said he 
wanted, but his code snippet doesn't show that.

If there is no externally accessible fn.__params__ dict, then there's no 
race hazard. I see no reason why a __params__ local variable would be 
subject to race conditions. But as you so rightly quoted the Zen at me 
for guessing in the face of ambiguity, without knowing what Steve 
intends, I can't answer your question.

As a purely internal local variable, it would still have the annoyance 
that writing to the dict might not actually effect the local values, the 
same issue that locals() has. But if we cared enough, we could make the 
dict a proxy rather than a real dict.

I see no reason why __params__ must be treated as special keyword, like 
__debug__, although given that it is involved in special compiler magic, 
that might be prudent.

(Although, in sufficient old versions of Python, even __debug__ was just 
a regular name.)


> Or perhaps it can be done, as I suggested,
> entirely within the execution frame on the stack?

Indeed.

Like I said right at the start, there shouldn't be any problem for the 
compiler adding a local variable to each function (or just when 
required) containing the initial arguments bound to the function 
parameters. *How* the compiler does it, whether it is done during 
compilation or on entry to the function call, or something else, is an 
implementation detail which presumably each Python interpreter can 
choose for itself.

All of this presumes that it is a desirable feature.



-- 
Steve


More information about the Python-ideas mailing list