[Python-ideas] Moving to another forum system where
chris.barker at noaa.gov
Thu Sep 20 14:10:27 EDT 2018
A point here:
any proposal that is an actual proposal, rather than a idea that needs
fleshing out, can benefit from being written down in a single document.
It does NOT have to be an official PEP in order for that to happen. If you
are advocating something, then write it down, post it gitHbu or some such,
and point people to it -- that's it.
Using this list alone (or any forum-like system) is not a good way to work
out the details of the proposal -- if you have a written out version, then
folks can debate what's actually in the proposal, and not the various
already discussed and rejected idea that float around in multiple
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 7:46 PM, Michael Selik <mike at selik.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 10:25 AM Anders Hovmöller <boxed at killingar.net>
> > >>> Not for drafting, but for submitting.
> > >>
> > >> Can you quote pep1? I think you’re wrong.
> > >
> > > I can't remember if I pulled this quote previously (that's one of the
> > > troubles with emails): "Following a discussion on python-ideas, the
> > > proposal should be submitted as a draft PEP ..."
> > >
> > > Could you clarify what you think is inaccurate in the previous
> > It later states this is just to avoid submitting bad ideas. It’s not
> actually a requirement but a (supposed) kindness.
> Some regulations are de jure, others are de facto.
> Python-ideas mailing list
> Python-ideas at python.org
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
Chris.Barker at noaa.gov
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Python-ideas