[Python-ideas] Dict joining using + and +=
Serhiy Storchaka
storchaka at gmail.com
Thu Feb 28 02:16:55 EST 2019
27.02.19 20:48, Guido van Rossum пише:
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:42 AM Michael Selik
> <mike at selik.org
> <mailto:mike at selik.org>> wrote > The dict subclass collections.Counter overrides the update method
> for adding values instead of overwriting values.
>
> https://docs.python.org/3/library/collections.html#collections.Counter.update
>
> Counter also uses +/__add__ for a similar behavior.
>
> >>> c = Counter(a=3, b=1)
> >>> d = Counter(a=1, b=2)
> >>> c + d # add two counters together: c[x] + d[x]
> Counter({'a': 4, 'b': 3})
>
> At first I worried that changing base dict would cause confusion for
> the subclass, but Counter seems to share the idea that update and +
> are synonyms.
>
>
> Great, this sounds like a good argument for + over |. The other argument
> is that | for sets *is* symmetrical, while + is used for other
> collections where it's not symmetrical. So it sounds like + is a winner
> here.
Counter uses + for a *different* behavior!
>>> Counter(a=2) + Counter(a=3)
Counter({'a': 5})
I do not understand why we discuss a new syntax for dict merging if we
already have a syntax for dict merging: {**d1, **d2} (which works with
*all* mappings). Is not this contradicts the Zen?
More information about the Python-ideas
mailing list