michael at stroeder.com
Fri May 25 02:34:08 CEST 2001
David Leonard wrote:
> mmmm, release... everyone is eager to do an interim release.
> I think 1.10 could be "released" by just renaming 1.10a3 to 1.10 :)
No! That's not right. Review the CVS logs!
There were patches after 1.10a3 adressing proper handling of (error)
results of ldap_result (also by Konstantin) which slightly changes
the result returned by LDAPObject.result() method in case of no
result received. (Uuuh, did anybody of you understand this sentence?
AFAIK also another memory leak was fixed (if you didn't loose the
> 1.11 can also appear soon. it just needs a little more removing of
> non-openldapisms testing and then packaging.
No! Just leave it as it is. Please, please...
Call it 1.11 to avoid confusion because *it is* significantly
different from 1.10a3. But it's stable.
More information about the python-ldap