SWIG and binary strings?

A.M. Kuchling amk at mira.erols.com
Mon Jun 28 19:21:21 EDT 1999


On 28 Jun 1999 07:57:04 +0300, Markus Stenberg <mstenber at cc.Helsinki.FI> wrote:
>Ah, I've concentrated on SSL itself (TLS actually, but still; full TLS/SSL
>functionality, no ciphers whatsoever wrapped). I wish someone wrapped whole
>OpenSSL and maintained it.. ;-) (I'd do it, but I'm too lazy by half)

mxCrypto (http://www.cs.uni-duesseldorf.de/~lemburg/mxCrypto.html)
wraps the cipher implementations in OpenSSL; talk to M.A. Lemburg, the
author of mxCrypto, about incorporating your SWIG interfaces into
mxCrypto.  I believe he's been wanting to wrap the SSL interfaces for
a while; you may be able to save him some time.

	(mxCrypto + SSL socket support would be a wonderful thing to
have, particularly if it's developed outside of the US.)

-- 
A.M. Kuchling			http://starship.python.net/crew/amk/
It would be nice to be unfailingly, perpetually, remorselessly funny, day in
and day out, year in and year out until somebody murdered you, now wouldn't it?
    -- Robertson Davies, _The Diary of Samuel Marchbanks_
 




More information about the Python-list mailing list