Python mailing list vs. References: (was Re: My quarterly question on Design by Contract in Python...)
Randall Hopper
aa8vb at vislab.epa.gov
Tue May 11 06:36:19 EDT 1999
Aahz Maruch:
|I've noticed that posts from both Tim Peters and David Ascher are coming
|through unthreaded, and I suspect it's because either either the mailing
|list software or their mailers are not preserving the References: line
|correctly. Is there anything that can be done about this?
No problem with threading here, on this thread for example, but I'm using
mutt (http://www.mutt.org/).
|(It's also annoying to get posts cc'd to me by e-mail, but at least I
|can tell when they're going to be public, too.)
Are you setting your Mail-Followup-To: header? I don't know if this is in
a standards doc somewhere, but if this header is set, group replies in Mutt
won't include the original sender.
I personally prefer to receive e-mail replies, so I always tell Mutt "not"
to set this header:
.muttrc:
unset followup_to # Yes, I want e-mail for list replies
Randall
More information about the Python-list
mailing list