The Simple Economics of Open Source
robin at jessikat.demon.co.uk
Sat Apr 22 10:35:37 CEST 2000
In article <raffael-63EB69.23345321042000 at news.ne.mediaone.net>, Raffael
Cavallaro <raffael at mediaone.net> writes
>In article <f4JdfuAkLKA5EwcQ at jessikat.demon.co.uk>, Robin Becker
><robin at jessikat.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>exchange ideas, concepts and criticism freely, but compete for
>Speaking as a painter, I can tell you that many painters do not share
>ideas and concepts, but are quite secretive about them. In fact, there
>is a long history of artists keeping their working methods secret from
>each other, for precisely the same reason that any other set of business
Clearly not all do; same with hackers. You must know a different set of
artists and painters. The ones I know seem to have a sort of verbal
diarrhoea about how wonderful they are and how they achieved exactly
which effect etc etc etc.
Grinding the paint etc corresponds to real infrastructure like getting
the chips to work better. The problems and solutions of perspective,
style, lighting and the like are discoverable in the product by the keen
observer. It might be harder to discover the secret of 'true' vermilion
or exactly how such accurate perspective effects were achieved.
Artists are forced into a dialogue if not directly with each other at
least with their clients and hence with each other.
More information about the Python-list