echuck at mindspring.com
Mon Apr 10 04:29:53 CEST 2000
Nick Maclaren wrote:
> To the several people who suggested:
> (a() and [b()] or [c()])
> Thank you for the suggestion. I have occasionally used perversities
> like that (such as '*(x ? &a : &b) = y;' in C to mimic the Algol 68
> facility), but I don't regard them as clarifying the code, either!
OK, so what does the Algol 68 code look like for that C code and any other interesting cases?
More information about the Python-list