ANN: Stackless Python for MacOS

[Boris Borcic]

Just van Rossum wrote:
> 
> Even though I still hardly understand the implications of it all yet,
> Stackless is IHMO the most exciting new Python development at the time,
> together with Unicode support in 1.6. Stackless will most likely not be
> incorporated into Python 1.6, but *maybe* if we make enough noise we can
> convince Guido it should go into 1.7... More stackless killer apps please!

I'd argue for "Python 1.618" - the golden ratio.

BB
--
"C++ is a contradiction in terms" -- Einstein