ANN: Stackless Python for MacOS

Boris Borcic zorro at
Wed Apr 5 05:45:52 EDT 2000

Just van Rossum wrote:
> Even though I still hardly understand the implications of it all yet,
> Stackless is IHMO the most exciting new Python development at the time,
> together with Unicode support in 1.6. Stackless will most likely not be
> incorporated into Python 1.6, but *maybe* if we make enough noise we can
> convince Guido it should go into 1.7... More stackless killer apps please!

I'd argue for "Python 1.618" - the golden ratio.

"C++ is a contradiction in terms" -- Einstein

More information about the Python-list mailing list