Dict can't update with dict-like objects

[Frank Niessink]

Guido van Rossum <guido at beopen.com> wrote:

> It is my intention to *eventually* remove all such restrictions.  This
> goes slowly because it has to be done one operation at a time.
> E.g. somewhere aling 1.5.x, (a,b,c) = [1,2,3] became legal.  In 2.0,
> [].extend(UserList()) will be legal.  I'll make a mental note that
> {}.update() needs to be expanded too.  A separate method name is quite
> unnecessary (the update() function can simply branch on the argument
> type).

Could you please make another mental note (or expand the first one) 
for eval()?

Thanks, Frank
-- 
"Ford!" he said, "there's an infinite number of monkeys outside who want to
talk to us about this script for Hamlet they've worked out."
	-- Douglas Adams, 'The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy'