Python 2.1 and Stackless

Courageous jkraska1 at san.rr.com
Tue Aug 15 21:29:36 EDT 2000


> You are correct. The situation is sustainable, though definitely not
> optimal. And should the fork continue, I would expect the tines to be
> parallel, not increasingly divergent.

All that's really necessary is that the "stackless"
addition to python must be compatible with future
releases of python. One should be able to decide
they want the stackless feature, be able to patch
it on, and expect this to not break all other features
of python, or also other extensions.

C//



More information about the Python-list mailing list