[fnorb] Fnorb implementation of POA : when expected ?

[Samuel A. Falvo II]

On Tue, 29 Aug 2000 jurgen.defurne at philips.com wrote:

> I suspect that the main reason for changing the BOA to POA, is the fact that under the BOA, one needs to create
> a new implementation for every new object created.

You need to do this for POA as well, even if the object isn't "activated"
right away.

But one more thing -- is it possible to narrow down your linewrapping to,
say, 75 characters?  :-)

--
KC5TJA/6, DM13, QRP-L #1447 | Official Channel Saint, *Team Amiga*
Samuel A. Falvo II	    |
Oceanside, CA		    |