Is Stackless and uthread.py SMP friendly?
tismer at tismer.com
Fri Dec 15 11:48:45 CET 2000
jbalding at hotmail.com wrote:
> I read with interest a recent thread asking about threading, the global
> interpreter lock, and symmetric multiprocessing. Nobody mentioned, as
> far as I could see, Stackless Python and microthreads. Having just
> picked up a dual PIII machine, will Stackless and uthread.py make my SMP
> experience with Python a happy one?
Stackless will work just fine, but there is no support for
the second processor. If Python should support having
a real thread for every real processor in some future,
you can of course run microthreads on top of each.
Probably not what you are looking for :-)
ciao - chris
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer at tismer.com>
Mission Impossible 5oftware : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Kaunstr. 26 : *Starship* http://starship.python.net
14163 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net
PGP Fingerprint E182 71C7 1A9D 66E9 9D15 D3CC D4D7 93E2 1FAE F6DF
where do you want to jump today? http://www.stackless.com
More information about the Python-list