A Suggestion for Python Colon Syntax

William Djaja Tjokroaminata billtj at y.glue.umd.edu
Thu Dec 21 12:43:29 EST 2000

Fredrik Lundh <fredrik at effbot.org> wrote:
: "William Djaja Tjokroaminata" wrote:
:> However, a lot of time when I ran my Python program, I got syntax
:> error, because I forgot to put colon (:) after my if (or for, etc.) clause.
:> My question is, is the colon really necessary, syntactically, in Python?

: Short answer:  The colon isn't there for the computer, it's
: there for human readers.  Just like the colons in your post:

Well, the colons in my post is because I am writing in English.  But
Python does not have semicolon etc, just to make it "pretty", but they do
have consequences if they are omitted.  I personally don't see how the
colon help me more in distinguishing the clause from the body of the
clause when reading a Python code, because the indentation is supposed to
be the marker.

:> My suggestion is as follows:
:> 1) If the if (or for, etc.) clause is followed by a block, then the colon
:> is optional (for backward compatibility):
:>    if condition is true
:>        statement_1
:>        statement_2
:>        ....

: (Using colons and indentations in the same way as in other written
: languages is just one of many ideas Python has borrowed from the
: ABC language: http://www.cwi.nl/~steven/abc )

Well, I don't know the rest of the people who use Python, but I
personally don't know anything about the ABC language.  If a feature is
borrowed from C or Java or Perl, I think it is good.  But a feature that
seems to add nothing from an obscure language to me is questionable.

: :::

: Longer answer: ... nah, I'll leave that to the "while true" crowd.
: I'm sure they'll keep you entertained until the end of next year!

I am waiting, everyone....

: :::

: Happy holidays, everyone!

: </F>


More information about the Python-list mailing list