aleaxit at yahoo.com
Wed Dec 6 17:37:40 CET 2000
"Greg Landrum" <glandrum at my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:90liij$805$1 at nnrp1.deja.com...
> >The sort() method takes an optional argument specifying a comparison
> >function of two arguments (list items) which should return -1, 0 or 1
> >depending on whether the first argument is considered smaller than,
> >equal to, or larger than the second argument.
> So the answer to the original question would be:
> l.sort (lambda a, b : a - b)
Not sure that works, but, according to the docs you just quoted,
it shouldn't, as it will not return just -1 or +1 for different
a and b. Not to mention what happens if they're strings!-)
l.sort(lambda a, b : cmp(a,b))
might work better -- that's what the builtin cmp function IS
for, after all. (But the Schwartzian Transform I already
suggested is better yet:-).
[Admittedly, cmp is NOT documented to return just -1 or +1,
as sort is documented to require, but I _dearly hope_ that
either of these IS just a glitch in the docs!-)]
More information about the Python-list