Why no shared libpython by default?

Michael Hudson mwh21 at cam.ac.uk
Thu Dec 14 10:52:49 EST 2000


Bjoern Giesler <Bjoern.Giesler at gmx.de> writes:

> why isn't libpython built as a shared library by default? Yes, I know how to
> set it up as a shared library, and it's not that much of a hassle, but why
> not as standard?

Because noone's bothered to integrate it with the build system, AIUI.
Bear in mind that this is non-trivial; I think Python is more portable
than libtool.

If you feel inspired, you probably know what to do with your patch...

Cheers,
M.

-- 
112. Computer Science is embarrassed by the computer.
  -- Alan Perlis, http://www.cs.yale.edu/homes/perlis-alan/quotes.html



More information about the Python-list mailing list