Case Sensitivity and Learnability
Dennis Lee Bieber
wlfraed at ix.netcom.com
Wed Feb 2 22:45:19 EST 2000
On 2 Feb 2000 17:29:15 GMT, Donn Cave <donn at u.washington.edu> declaimed
the following in comp.lang.python:
> will Python 2.0 have for them? Wouldn't it be nice if it could
> accept MessageRecieved as a valid spelling for MessageReceived,
> for example?
>
<euuuwww>
What if it was (unwise, but...) deliberate?
I recall a FORTRAN porting job nearly 20 years ago. Program went
from a decent FORTRAN IV to a system with minimum F-IV (or, as I
referred to it, FORTRAN minus-2; Microsoft F-80 on CP/M was more
powerful).
The target system could not compile statements of the form:
call xyz(a, a+1, b(a), b(a+2))
which had to be converted to:
jinx = a+1
linx = a+1
call xyz(a, jinx, b(a), b(linx))
Some calls made use of four or five junk temporaries -- imagine
every spelling of {j|l|m| }{i|y}nx appearing in a file... Imagine the
mayhem if the compiler attempts to "correct" these to a common set.
--
> ============================================================== <
> wlfraed at ix.netcom.com | Wulfraed Dennis Lee Bieber KD6MOG <
> wulfraed at dm.net | Bestiaria Support Staff <
> ============================================================== <
> Bestiaria Home Page: http://www.beastie.dm.net/ <
> Home Page: http://www.dm.net/~wulfraed/ <
More information about the Python-list
mailing list