Corel + Borland = The End of MS Win

Fredrik Lundh effbot at telia.com
Fri Feb 11 06:08:25 EST 2000


Oleg Orlov <orlov at diasoft.ru> wrote:
> All these features already were discussed here earlier, but
> I do not find any convincing reason not to include them into
> Python 1.6

time?

Python 1.6 is almost frozen, and alphas should
appear really soon.

but for Py3K, sure.

...

just one nit:

> Extensions for Ruby written in C/C++ can easily
> define Ruby classes.

so can Python extensions written in C/C++.  it's
just that types are more efficient in the CPython
implementation, so nobody's doing that.

</F>





More information about the Python-list mailing list