Corel + Borland = The End of MS Win
Fredrik Lundh
effbot at telia.com
Fri Feb 11 06:08:25 EST 2000
Oleg Orlov <orlov at diasoft.ru> wrote:
> All these features already were discussed here earlier, but
> I do not find any convincing reason not to include them into
> Python 1.6
time?
Python 1.6 is almost frozen, and alphas should
appear really soon.
but for Py3K, sure.
...
just one nit:
> Extensions for Ruby written in C/C++ can easily
> define Ruby classes.
so can Python extensions written in C/C++. it's
just that types are more efficient in the CPython
implementation, so nobody's doing that.
</F>
More information about the Python-list
mailing list