Iterators & generators (RE: Real Problems with Python)

Moshe Zadka moshez at
Tue Feb 15 04:06:20 EST 2000

On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Tim Peters wrote:

> That doesn't fit with Python at all, so I'm just trying to get the most
> useful & conventional & well-behaved part:  explicit generation when you ask
> for it, at the function level.  That would add enormous bang for the buck,
> and greatly aid clarity when appropriately used.  So that much is Pythonic
> to the core.

I'm a little ignorant on both the bang and the buck issues. While what
Tim said certainly shows there's a big bang, I'm wondering about the buck.
Modulu Stackless, what would it take to implement this?
Moshe Zadka <mzadka at>. 
INTERNET: Learn what you know.
Share what you don't.

More information about the Python-list mailing list