MetaKit for python (Mk4py) on Macintosh ... no way :(
claird at starbase.neosoft.com
Tue Feb 29 17:31:46 CET 2000
In article <arnaud-D687FF.10421329022000 at news.wanadoo.fr>,
Arnaud Fontaine <arnaud at crao.net> wrote:
>Now MetaKit is working fine and does almost what I want :)
So what is MetaKit lacking? I think
perhaps I'm not following some of the
flurry of posts in this thread.
>I also tried Gadfly which is plenty old SQL but, as far as I try it,
>less suitable for objects persistence.
>> A MetaKit row is an object, but not an object of your making.
>> It can have properties that are ints, strings, doubles, or other
>> views. So while it's not pickle, it's a whole lot easier to map
>> object persistence into Metakit than into a conventional
>Sure it is !
>If MetaKit doesn't yet have an orthogonal persistence model, it seems to
>be on a good way.
>Maybe the next step will be a mixed of pickle and MetaKit. I like the
>MetaKit way to query objects. We're getting close to OQL (maybe I'm
>wrong with the name ... haven't touch an O2 database for years).
>> Don't think you'll find anything that meets those requirements
>> that doesn't consume vast amounts of resources (including
>> $$, probably).
>Memory ... gigabytes of memory. But yet, I'm not sure I can find any
>commercial products to meet my requirements.
>Actually, I'm trying to set this on a cluster and, as I have very few
>data modifications (4 times a day) I'm looking toward duplication of the
>database (data distribution thru LH* or RP* gives me headache) ... But
>all this is a bit out of topic ;-)
*That*'s an interesting usage profile!
Let's return to this later; perhaps we
can generate still other ideas for you.
One mystery to me: why doesn't DB2 get
more attention? Version 6 has large
objects, user-defined types, user-defined
functions, triggers, and is available at
no charge for Linux. I'm just astounded
that this hasn't created more of a buzz.
I'm bring it up here because, with all
the Version 6 goodies, IBM has taken to
talking about its "object-relational"
capabilities and "support for object
orientation". It might suit your needs
to host DB2 on a Linux box, and leave
just the client software on your MacOS
desktops. If I didn't have MetaKit, I'd
probably go in a much different direc-
tion and see how nicely Python and DB2
can play together.
Cameron Laird <claird at NeoSoft.com>
More information about the Python-list