[Doc-SIG] Monty: A structured text syntax idea
cfelling at iae.nl
Sat Feb 5 16:37:17 EST 2000
I didn't intent to correct you like that, I merely used your error
to vent this wish of mine to get summaries from the sigs.
Gerrit Holl <gerrit.holl at pobox.com> wrote:
> I was frustated by the fact no Reply-To: header was set, but from now
> on, I'll do a g)roup reply (mutt). I'm sorry.
You could use mutt's list capabilities and do a L)ist reply and yes I
sympathise with your resentment of missing headers.
> My .procmailrc in 288 LOC.
excuse my ignorance, but my parser gave up on this one:)
More information about the Python-list