Python and COM: Aggregation?

[John Doty]

Groovy.  I'll get right on it then.  :)

I've just been digging though the source, does look pretty easy... will it
be a problem if people have to rebuild all the extentions?  I don't think I
can do it in a binary-compatible way.

Also, while I'm on the subject-- has anybody written extentions for COM+
1.0?

john


"Mark Hammond" <MarkH at ActiveState.com> wrote in message
news:SNPf5.13158$4p3.102513 at news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> "John Doty" <j.doty at gte.net> wrote in message
> news:AiPf5.138$6Z.107941 at paloalto-snr1.gtei.net...
> > I love Python.  I want to use it for all my programming needs.
> >
> > But I can't.
> >
> > Is there a reason that COM objects implemented in Python are not
> > aggregatable?
>
> Simply no one has been bothered to add it.  AFAIK, no one plans to,
> either.  Patches would be accepted tho!  Should be not too difficult as we
> already support delegation of IUnknown back to another object to support
> COM identity rules.
>
> Mark.
>
>
>