Threads?

[Dale Strickland-Clark]

You mean I have a choice? It supports both?

Either or both, is the answer.

I want separate execution paths that run concurrently to (or appear to) the
main one but share the same code.

The ability for the processes/threads to share memory and signal each other
would be a bonus.

Thanks

--
Dale Strickland-Clark
Out-Think Ltd, UK
Business Technology Consultants

Aahz Maruch <aahz at netcom.com> wrote in message
news:8jlvat$ohi$1 at nntp9.atl.mindspring.net...
> In article <8jlnkh$7h$1 at supernews.com>,
> Dale Strickland-Clark <dale at out-think.NOSPAMco.uk> wrote:
> >
> >Can Python execute a function from the same module in another process?
> >I might do this, for example, to take advantage of multiple processors.
>
> I'm a bit confused here.  The Subject says "Threads?" but your text says
> "process".  Which is it?
> --
>                       --- Aahz (Copyright 2000 by aahz at netcom.com)
>
> Androgynous poly kinky vanilla queer het    <*>
http://www.rahul.net/aahz/
> Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
>
> The best way to get information on Usenet is not to ask a question,
> but to post the wrong information.  --Aahz