Memory leak problems with python and COM

Stefan Migowsky smigowsky at dspace.de
Mon Jul 17 07:51:14 EDT 2000


Hi,

you didn't miss the 131 build. This build was purely to test
against the developer version von Python 1.6. So the release
numbers would be ... 128, 129, 132 

   Stefan

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Etienne Labuschagne [mailto:etiennel at geospace.co.za]
>Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 9:17 AM
>To: python-list at python.org
>Subject: Re: Memory leak problems with python and COM
>
>
>Hi there
>
>To my embarrasment I found that I am still using Python build 
>129 and that I
>(somehow) missed the release of build 131!
>
>Anyway, build 131 solved the problem!
>
>Thanks for your help.
>
>Regards
>Etienne
>
>"Mark Hammond" <mhammond at skippinet.com.au> wrote in message
>news:8klbu9$38u$1 at nnrp1.deja.com...
>> In article <963474833.835936 at proxy.lia.net>,
>>   "Etienne Labuschagne" <etiennel at geospace.co.za> wrote:
>> > Deleted a and b on the python side and then destroying the COM
>> server - that
>> > doesn't clear up the memory. I am using SafeArrayAccessData and
>> > SafeArrayUnlock on the server side to make sure that it 
>releases the
>> data on
>> > the server side.
>> >
>> > Is there something else that I must do?
>>
>> I suggest you get the latest CVS version (I realize this may be a
>> PITA :-(  Since build 132, a number of leaks have been 
>fixed.  There is
>> a very good chance that this particular leak was plugged previously.
>>
>> If not, I will definately look into this and plug it!
>>
>> Mark.
>>
>>
>> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>> Before you buy.
>
>
>-- 
>http://www.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>




More information about the Python-list mailing list