Discussion: new operators for numerical computation

John Lull lull at acm.org
Sun Jul 23 11:00:26 EDT 2000


(posted & mailed)

hzhu at knowledgetrack.com (Huaiyu Zhu) wrote (with possible deletions):

> Would someone like to make a brief summary of the thread on (*) type
> operators?  I did not follow all of them, and can't seem to be able to
> figure out what the consensus is now.  Whether this goes into the PEP, it
> would be nice to have a summary of the discussion so far.  Thanks.

I think Tim Hochberg's summary in message
<m2wvifm2bd.fsf at spiff.home.com> is pretty good.

> John, would you volunteer?

If you think something more is needed, I'm willing to try, but I'm not
sure what else is needed.

Regards,
John



More information about the Python-list mailing list