Discussion: new operators for numerical computation
John Lull
lull at acm.org
Sun Jul 23 11:00:26 EDT 2000
(posted & mailed)
hzhu at knowledgetrack.com (Huaiyu Zhu) wrote (with possible deletions):
> Would someone like to make a brief summary of the thread on (*) type
> operators? I did not follow all of them, and can't seem to be able to
> figure out what the consensus is now. Whether this goes into the PEP, it
> would be nice to have a summary of the discussion so far. Thanks.
I think Tim Hochberg's summary in message
<m2wvifm2bd.fsf at spiff.home.com> is pretty good.
> John, would you volunteer?
If you think something more is needed, I'm willing to try, but I'm not
sure what else is needed.
Regards,
John
More information about the Python-list
mailing list