Ruby -- A better OO Perl than Perl? Python 3000 features available now?
Aahz Maruch
aahz at netcom.com
Wed Jun 7 12:22:34 EDT 2000
In article <8hlrkn$5t2$1 at nnrp1.deja.com>, <david_ullrich at my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> Not if they never hear about it. I thought he went out of his
>way to be polite, to make it clear that he wasn't saying Python
>bad Ruby good. Sounds to me like something that might be of
>interest to a lot of Python people.
> Maybe it doesn't matter to people who are somehow instantaneously
>informed of everything, but the rest of us appreciate a little bit
>of marginally on-topic information. (I first heard about Delphi when
>I was lurking in a VB group trying to figure out whether it was more
>awful or less awful than the BASIC I was using at the time...)
Well, Ruby comes up often enough naturally. I think the objection here
comes from the explicit advertisement combined with the repetition (this
isn't the first time).
--
--- Aahz (Copyright 2000 by aahz at netcom.com)
Androgynous poly kinky vanilla queer het <*> http://www.rahul.net/aahz/
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
"You could make Eskimos emigrate to the Sahara by vigorously arguing --
at hundreds of screens' length -- for the wonder, beauty, and utility of
snow." -- PNH to rb in r.a.sf.f
More information about the Python-list
mailing list