Ruby -- A better OO Perl than Perl? Python 3000 features available now?

Aahz Maruch aahz at netcom.com
Wed Jun 7 12:22:34 EDT 2000


In article <8hlrkn$5t2$1 at nnrp1.deja.com>,  <david_ullrich at my-deja.com> wrote:
>
>    Not if they never hear about it. I thought he went out of his
>way to be polite, to make it clear that he wasn't saying Python
>bad Ruby good. Sounds to me like something that might be of
>interest to a lot of Python people.
>    Maybe it doesn't matter to people who are somehow instantaneously
>informed of everything, but the rest of us appreciate a little bit
>of marginally on-topic information. (I first heard about Delphi when
>I was lurking in a VB group trying to figure out whether it was more
>awful or less awful than the BASIC I was using at the time...)

Well, Ruby comes up often enough naturally.  I think the objection here
comes from the explicit advertisement combined with the repetition (this
isn't the first time).
--
                      --- Aahz (Copyright 2000 by aahz at netcom.com)

Androgynous poly kinky vanilla queer het    <*>     http://www.rahul.net/aahz/
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

"You could make Eskimos emigrate to the Sahara by vigorously arguing --
at hundreds of screens' length -- for the wonder, beauty, and utility of 
snow."  -- PNH to rb in r.a.sf.f



More information about the Python-list mailing list