boolean true and false values.

[Peter Schneider-Kamp]

Emile van Sebille wrote:
> 
> Only when I want to know about the bits.  It's so
> much easier to recognize 122 octal as having
> alternate bits set than the equivalent in decimal
> or hex.

much easier than decimal - of course! But what is
wrong about 52? By the way 122 is not alternating...
125 is. But then 55 is probably much better to read.

or-did-you-mean-something-else-ly y'rs
Peter
--
Peter Schneider-Kamp          ++47-7388-7331
Herman Krags veg 51-11        mailto:peter at schneider-kamp.de
N-7050 Trondheim              http://schneider-kamp.de