stackless/microthread merge

Christian Tismer tismer at
Thu Mar 2 21:51:56 CET 2000

Warren Postma wrote:
[skipping nice words - thanks :-)]

> I can see stackless+microthread going on to challenge regular python by very
> careful optimizations at it's core. I'm seriously going to consider using
> this for my embedded control [SCADA, Radio Telemetry] uses, because I think
> thread latency is a pretty key part of any complex control system.

We're doing our best. For my part, I'm writing the fastest possible
but still flexible scheduler kernel that I can consider. Due to
Will's input, it has builtin thread locking already, to provide
atomic operations. But the stuff beyond the absolute basics
(which is about two or three extra support functions), everything
is done by Python, and people can implement their own thread
implementation on top of it.
Will will be the first one, of course. :-)

> I can't wait to see what this looks like when it's finished! :-) Very very
> cool!

I'm finishing the last function, so it will probably be less than
a week, unless I see a hairy bug.

cheers - chris

Christian Tismer             :^)   <mailto:tismer at>
Applied Biometrics GmbH      :     Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Kaunstr. 26                  :    *Starship*
14163 Berlin                 :     PGP key ->
PGP Fingerprint       E182 71C7 1A9D 66E9 9D15  D3CC D4D7 93E2 1FAE F6DF
     we're tired of banana software - shipped green, ripens at home

More information about the Python-list mailing list