UserList.__getslice__(): copy.copy(self.data) vs. self.__class__(self.data).
Alex
alex at somewhere.round.here
Tue Mar 14 17:37:00 EST 2000
> Though this follows the guidelines outlined in the reference manual,
> it has an interesting side effect: it instantiates a new object of the
> same class but it loses the current values of all attributes.
>
> Is this desireable behavior? Personally, I don't believe that it is.
> My thinking is that the current internal state of the class should
> pass to the newly instantiated object.
Sometimes, that's what you want, and, in my experience, sometimes not.
UserList is intended as a base class, so you can override any methods
that aren't doing what you want. For instance, you could do something
like this:
from UserList import UserList
class NewUserList (UserList):
def __getslice__ (self, i, j):
i = max(i, 0); j = max(j, 0)
userlist = copy.copy(self)
userlist.data[:] = self.data[i:j]
return userlist
... and use NewUserList in your project instead.
Hope this helps.
Alex.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list