Should Python documentation for __class__ be improved?

Tom Funk _spam_sux_tdfunk at _spam_sux_nettally.com
Thu Mar 16 18:13:39 CET 2000


In an article posted 15 Mar 2000 19:09:27 +0100,
Martin von Loewis (loewis at informatik.hu-berlin.de) said:
> If you read the types page from the beginning to the end, you should
> notice the discussion of "Class", after which " __class__ is the
> instance's class" should be clear. 

You caught me.... <g>  I'll go back and start at the top of the page.

> However, if it isn't, it is
> difficult for the documentation write to know how the wording should
> be to make it clearer. So it would be good if you submitted improved
> wording yourself <no, I won't use wink>

I'll do that, but should I submit it directly to Fred Drake (keeper of 
the Python documentation) or post it here?

-- 
-=< tom >=-
Thomas D. Funk                           |   "Software is the lever
Software Engineering Consultant          |   Archimedes was seeking"
Advanced Systems Design, Tallahassee FL. |




More information about the Python-list mailing list