What If Python Replaced Elisp?
Moshe Zadka
moshez at math.huji.ac.il
Fri Mar 10 16:04:41 EST 2000
On 10 Mar 2000, Justin Sheehy wrote:
> kragen at dnaco.net (Kragen Sitaker) writes:
>
> > Well, Python is probably not as hard to optimize as Lisp and Scheme
> > dialects.
>
> This is an interesting statement. On what do you base it?
I don't know any Lisp (I assume he means Common Lisp) but Scheme is
*almost* as dynamic as Python. What's more a reasonable subset of Python
(toss out eval, exec and looking too quizzically at sys.exc_info()) is
easily described via compilation to Scheme. Hence any Scheme optimization
can be a Python optimization.
--
Moshe Zadka <mzadka at geocities.com>.
http://www.oreilly.com/news/prescod_0300.html
More information about the Python-list
mailing list