win32all-129-update.exe - Is it needed?
mhammond at skippinet.com.au
Mon May 8 00:49:41 CEST 2000
I will update the web page to hopefully clear up some of this confusion:
* win32all-129 was released to registered users quite some time ago
(registered users now have build 132 (for 1.5.2) available
* There were bugs, and instead of releasing a complete new build, I
released the update. It only changes files installed by 129.
* Therefore, you should install win32all-129, then win32all-129-update.
* If you have any earlier builds (eg, 128) already installed, the
installation of 129 will suggest and offer to uninstall the previous
"Joe Smith" <JoeSmith at bogusaddress.com> wrote in message
news:YhjR4.44823$k5.1318845 at news1.frmt1.sfba.home.com...
> This was supposed to be installed before I install 129?
> <aklietz at my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:8f30cp$g5m$1 at nnrp1.deja.com...
> > Good question! With 663K of patches presumably to the core Python
> > 1.5.2 distribution, I would hesitate to install win32all129 without
> > Version 128 mentioned only a single patch as far as I know
> > The download site is
> > http://starship.python.net/crew/mhammond/win32/Downloads.html
> > -Alan
> > In article <X73R4.44404$k5.1290605 at news1.frmt1.sfba.home.com>,
> > "Joe Smith" <JoeSmith at bogusaddress.com> wrote:
> > > On the starship site is says:
> > > Also download and install the patch set for build 129 -
> > > win32all-129-update.exe (663,799 bytes)
> > >
> > > Is this needed if one installs win32all-129.exe?
More information about the Python-list