Future of the Python Linux Distribution
m.faassen at vet.uu.nl
Fri May 12 21:20:40 CEST 2000
Andrew M. Kuchling <akuchlin at mems-exchange.org> wrote:
> Glyph Lefkowitz writes:
>>2) is OCaML-Python free?
> I'm not sure what the licence is, but vaguely recall it's the same as
> Python's. Could be wrong...
I think you're wrong. It's something like "here's the source but it's
copyright John Skaller as Jon Skaller wants to find a way to make
enough money to eat". At least last I checked.
>>4) Why don't we hear more about this? What is all this jpython hype
> It's not very widely advertised, perhaps because it's still an alpha.
> Some of the extensions seem difficult to implement in CPython or
> JPython, but it's quite possible that Vyper could go on to become the
> first languages that derives from Python.
Those languages will probably be interesting. I've been toying with some
language ideas for a while now (since before I discovered Python). Then
I discovered Python and it was so much like that language (but a lot
better) in some respects that I stopped thinking about it for a while.
Now I'm thinking about it again occasionally. I've learned a lot from
Python's pragmaticism, focus on readable syntax (just enough sugar to
make it read nicely, but not more), and flexibility traded off for
speed. I was concentrating way too much on the 'this needs to be
optimizable to heck' aspect of language design, and I now realize that's
not so important. Maybe in a couple of years I'll start implementing
it seriously; maybe not.
I bet there are more people in this newsgroup toying
with such ideas; in fact it'd be a prerequisite almost to be interested
in this, as otherwise it'd be hard to discover Python (at least pre-1998 or
so). I know for a fact Tim Peters wants to design a language that has
'foo' and 'bar' as hidden reserve words. :)
History of the 20th Century: WW1, WW2, WW3?
No, WWW -- Could we be going in the right direction?
More information about the Python-list