Java vs Python
Tim Rowe
digitig at cix.co.uk
Sat May 27 18:32:00 EDT 2000
In article <392FF563.403AD31F at home.com>, ivanlan at home.com (Ivan Van
Laningham) wrote:
> Hi All--
> faatdilac at my-deja.com wrote:
> >
>
> [bobbit]
>
> > It's a thankless & shameless attitude to say that C is not generally
> > useful while C has been feeding generations of software professionals.
> >
> > The name Dennis M. Ritchie shines as long as Perl, Tcl/Tk, Python
> > exist.
> > Show me a commercially successful language compiler developed in any
> > of
> > the scripting languages. Show me an OS developed in any of the
> > scripting languages.
> >
> > The software world would be much poorer without C.
> >
>
> I started programming back in the 60s with 1401 Autocoder. I moved to
> COBOL, and thought, "how wonderful!" because it was *so* much easier.
>
> I discovered unix and C in 1983, and was *overwhelmed* by the a)
> sensibility of unix; and b) the power and expressiveness of C.
>
> Are there any OSs written in COBOL? I think not.
Isn't this a Procrustean, "one-size-fits-all" argument, though? C was
designed as a system programming language, COBOL wasn't. Next time you
fly, hope all the critical software is in (Spark) Ada, Modula2 or some
such, not C. Horses for courses. I can program in Pascal, C++, Visual
Basic and FORTH; I used to be able to do FORTRAN but I've forgotten it all
now (and my FORTH is getting rusty!). I'm now adding Python because I see
it usefully filling a gap; I choose the language based on which is best
/for/ /the/ /job/ /in/ /hand/. There is surely no other sense of "best"
language!
More information about the Python-list
mailing list