[Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich , comparison
Konrad Hinsen
hinsen at cnrs-orleans.fr
Thu Oct 26 05:54:18 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich , comparison
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich , comparison
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
"Rainer Deyke" <root at rainerdeyke.com> writes:
> Floating points should not be part of the core language. The correct way to
> implement floating points is in terms of integers, preferable within the
> language (as opposed to a C extension).
If you don't like floating point numbers, you are free not to use
them. Many of us do need them, know how to deal with them, and need
them in a usable form, i.e. with decent performance and accessible
from C modules, which implies using the binary format provided by the
CPU. Your proposal is completely unrealistic.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Konrad Hinsen | E-Mail: hinsen at cnrs-orleans.fr
Centre de Biophysique Moleculaire (CNRS) | Tel.: +33-2.38.25.56.24
Rue Charles Sadron | Fax: +33-2.38.63.15.17
45071 Orleans Cedex 2 | Deutsch/Esperanto/English/
France | Nederlands/Francais
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich , comparison
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich , comparison
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Python-list
mailing list