Lets Talk More Threads
Alex McHale
daimun at home.com
Thu Oct 19 23:39:23 EDT 2000
Indeed, I was merely misreading. It was one of those things where your mind
picks it up as one thing, and no matter how many times I read it, I still
read it wrong. I misread 'at most once' for 'at least once'.
Sorry for the bad post.
On the plus hand, I've got it working beautifully for what I was wanting :).
Alex
"Aahz Maruch" <aahz at panix.com> wrote in message
news:8sn4oa$qe$1 at panix3.panix.com...
> In article <67DH5.155361$Qx4.5103925 at news1.rdc1.il.home.com>,
> Alex McHale <daimun at home.com> wrote:
> >
> >Using the Thread class, which I'm extremely happy with, I've run into
> >a problem. The documentation on the class suggests that you can
> >obj.start( ) a thread multiple times. Yet, when I do this, I get an
> >error to the effect of "thread already started" What I'm needing to do
> >is have a thread which I can resurrect over and over.
>
> If you tell me where in the docs it says this, I can either get it fixed
> or explain why your reading is wrong. The simplest good way to deal with
> this is to use a Queue object to pass work to the thread.
> --
> --- Aahz (Copyright 2000 by aahz at pobox.com)
>
> Androgynous poly kinky vanilla queer het <*>
http://www.rahul.net/aahz/
> Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
>
> "real love can't be explained by simplistic platitudes." --piranha
More information about the Python-list
mailing list