Notes on unittest.py

[Chris McDonough]

> > Blech.  Your way seems a lot less clunky.  I do, however, like the fact
that
> > PyUnit pretty much sticks to the Beck/Gamma JUnit semantics (for no good
> > reason other than I feel comfortable with them).
>
> What do you mean by "JUnit semantics"?  Is this something that could be
fixed?

Sorry, too fancy.  I just mean that the naming conventions for the framework
classes (e.g. TestRunner, TestSuite) and method names (e.g. setUp, tearDown)
are the same as JUnit (http://members.pingnet.ch/gamma/junit.htm).
Additionally, the output is exactly the same.