[Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich , comparison
Darren New
dnew at san.rr.com
Fri Oct 27 13:48:43 EDT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich , comparison
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich , comparison
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Alex Martelli wrote:
> mod (ideally) for truncating division
> remainder (currently existing but spelled %)
Better than spelling it with the *wrong* name. Why spell "remainder" as
"mod", which implies it is "modulo" when it isn't? Personally, I've never
found a need for "remainder" and often found a need for "modulo" and had to
fix it every time those two differ.
Sorry. Just a pet peeve. <meow>
--
Darren New / Senior MTS & Free Radical / Invisible Worlds Inc.
San Diego, CA, USA (PST). Cryptokeys on demand.
The tragedy of the commons applies to monitizing eyeballs, too.
- Previous message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich , comparison
- Next message (by thread): [Numpy-discussion] Re: numpy, overflow, inf, ieee, and rich , comparison
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Python-list
mailing list