Thinking about "print >>"

[David]

On Fri, 01 Sep 2000 18:46:04 -0400, Roy Smith <roy at popmail.med.nyu.edu>
wrote:

>I havn't followed the entire discussion of "print >>", so forgive me if 
>this covers ground that's been gone over already.

It's a done deal.  Signed, sealed and delivered.  Any further discussions
on it are entirely pointless.  The die is cast, the stone is set.  Etc.

In other words, it's been implemented and ain't never gonna be changed.