Python 1.6 The balanced language

lobozc at lobozc at
Sat Sep 2 01:36:26 CEST 2000

In article <8olv8a$tvj$1 at>,
  aahz at (Aahz Maruch) wrote:
> Generators are pretty likely to make it into Python through the
> Stackless implementation.  In addition, they're reasonably likely to
> make it in even without Stackless, assuming someone comes up with a
> implementation -- they'd be incredly useful for generic lazy "for"
> loops.
I suspected as much but I'm very happy to hear you confirming that. I
hope that the Stackless will make it one day (soon...)

Now, what about goal directed evaluation :-) ?

Sent via
Before you buy.

More information about the Python-list mailing list