Komodo in violation of Mozilla Public License?

[Dave LeBlanc]

It's funny - RMS and the Feed Stallman Foundation have gotten *quite*
comfortable off of income from GNU software. I just read something on
the Xemacs website about RMS' luxury penthouse apartment.

I recall back in the mid-80's reading about the FSF getting *large*
"grants" and lots of hardware from the likes of Fujitsu and others for
the priviledge of shipping GNU software on their ?MIPS/SPARC? clones
(sorry, it's been awhile). I was most disturbed by the fact that none
of the contributors of GNU code got anything either.

I don't think the FSF has a problem with making money at all.

Dave LeBlanc

On Tue, 10 Apr 2001 20:37:37 -0500 (CDT), Chris Watson
<chris at voodooland.net> wrote:

<snip>

>Amen! Being a BSD user I can completely appreciate AS's desire to *make
>money* *gasp* *shock*. The only people who have a problem with this are
>the nut case, GPL toting, anti-capitolism, anti-IP, anti-freedom, GPL
>nuts. But most people don't really care what they think. AS has made a
>good product that furthers Python usage! Way to go AS! Pat yourselves on
>the back! And ignore the whining from the headcases.
>
>=============================================================================
>-Chris Watson         (316) 326-3862 | FreeBSD Consultant, FreeBSD Geek
>Work:              scanner at jurai.net | Open Systems Inc., Wellington, Kansas
>Home:  scanner at deceptively.shady.org | http://open-systems.net
>=============================================================================
>WINDOWS: "Where do you want to go today?"
>LINUX: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
>BSD: "Are you guys coming or what?"
>=============================================================================
>irc.openprojects.net #FreeBSD -Join the revolution!
>ICQ: 20016186
>
>
>