Python Interpreter Reentrancy?
Aahz Maruch
aahz at panix.com
Sun Apr 22 20:34:04 EDT 2001
In article <987981537.217789 at rexx.com>,
Dave Kuhlman <dkuhlman at rexx.com> wrote:
>
>PyWX for AOLServer makes for an interesting comparison and is
>fancier still. PyWX gives you a (configuration) choice between (1)
>multiple Python interpreters, (2) reusing interpreters (from a pool
>of sub-interpreters), and (3) running scripts in separate threads
>within a single Python interpreter. I apologize if I'm confusing
>things a bit here. I'm still attempting to learn this myself.
Option (1) was the one that I wasn't aware had been done in practice.
--
--- Aahz <*> (Copyright 2001 by aahz at pobox.com)
Androgynous poly kinky vanilla queer het Pythonista http://www.rahul.net/aahz/
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
"...some experts might say a C++ program is not object-oriented without
inheritance and virtual functions. As one of the early Smalltalk
implementors myself, I can say they are full of themselves." --zconcept
More information about the Python-list
mailing list