Python Interpreter Reentrancy?

Aahz Maruch aahz at panix.com
Sun Apr 22 20:34:04 EDT 2001


In article <987981537.217789 at rexx.com>,
Dave Kuhlman  <dkuhlman at rexx.com> wrote:
>
>PyWX for AOLServer makes for an interesting comparison and is
>fancier still.  PyWX gives you a (configuration) choice between (1)
>multiple Python interpreters, (2) reusing interpreters (from a pool
>of sub-interpreters), and (3) running scripts in separate threads
>within a single Python interpreter.  I apologize if I'm confusing
>things a bit here. I'm still attempting to learn this myself.

Option (1) was the one that I wasn't aware had been done in practice.
-- 
                      --- Aahz  <*>  (Copyright 2001 by aahz at pobox.com)

Androgynous poly kinky vanilla queer het Pythonista   http://www.rahul.net/aahz/
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6

"...some experts might say a C++ program is not object-oriented without
inheritance and virtual functions.  As one of the early Smalltalk
implementors myself, I can say they are full of themselves." --zconcept



More information about the Python-list mailing list