2.2 features

[Markus Schaber]

Hi,

Greg Ewing wrote:

> > If you insist.  I think "x in type" is cleaner than isinstance(x,type).
> > The main problem with the second one is that it requires memory of the
> > order of the arguments, as well as the name of the syntax.
> 
> How about
> 
>    x in class c
> 
> for isinstance, and
> 
>    class c1 in class c2
> 
> for issubclass?

Reads very smooth in my eyes.

markus
-- 
Markus Schaber -- http://www.schabi.de/ -- ICQ: 22042130
+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| Allgemeine Sig-Verletzung 0815/4711  <nicht OK> <Erbrechen> |
+-------------------------------------------------------------+