why no ++?
aahz at panix.com
Tue Aug 14 16:43:01 CEST 2001
In article <9lan1301822 at enews1.newsguy.com>,
Alex Martelli <aleax at aleax.it> wrote:
>"Michael Abbott" <michael at rcp.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:Xns90FD5728D9CDAmichaelrcpcouk at 18.104.22.168...
>> Oops! Very true. I should have rewritten it as
>> e = 'wow'
>> b,c,d = 'wow'
>> a = 'wow'
>> Hmm. The argument about obfuscation versus repetition comes more clearly
>> into focus. I still think multiple assignment is a bad thing...
>So now consider:
> y.a = b,c,d = x.e = wower()
>How would you like to rewrite _this_?-) There is *NO* rewrite
>that ensures constant semantics except by introducing _another_
>temporary variable -- *yecch*!-)
So? Doing tuple packing and unpacking in the middle of a multiple
assignment statement is error-prone for maintenance. Get someone who
doesn't understand *precisely* what the above is doing, and your code
will likely malfunction under change. I certainly wouldn't understand
it without a lot of checking, and I might well make a casual mistake if
I *thought* I understood it.
--- Aahz <*> (Copyright 2001 by aahz at pobox.com)
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6 http://www.rahul.net/aahz/
Androgynous poly kinky vanilla queer het Pythonista
Internet $tartup$: Arbeit ueber alles
More information about the Python-list