freeBSD 2.1.1 extension problem
andymac at bullseye.apana.org.au
Tue Aug 28 12:19:00 CEST 2001
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Robin Becker wrote:
> In article <WWVECJAoEii7Ewnx at jessikat.fsnet.co.uk>, Robin Becker <robin at jessikat.fsnet.co.uk>
> >I'm guessing this might be some difference in the way the two
> >pythons/distutils were configured.
> Further research says that wchar.h was added to ISO C90 with amendment 1.
> Also it seems that
> mentions wchar.h a lot beginning 2001/may so perhaps Python-2.1.1 package
> has the requirement for wchar.h built in because freeBSD recently added
> Looking in the two config.h fiels, I see one with #define HAVE_WCHAR_H 1
> and one without.
If the binary Python package you've installed was built on a newer FreeBSD
(which seems likely from what I've gleaned from your posts) this is not
surprising, as the configure script would have found the errant header on
the newer system.
Andrew I MacIntyre "These thoughts are mine alone..."
E-mail: andymac at bullseye.apana.org.au | Snail: PO Box 370
andymac at pcug.org.au | Belconnen ACT 2616
Web: http://www.andymac.org/ | Australia
More information about the Python-list