typechecking etc??

Alex Martelli aleaxit at yahoo.com
Sat Aug 18 13:03:16 EDT 2001


"DR" <dean at valtronics.co.za> wrote in message news:3b7e8d15$0$222 at proctor...
> (although some respondents felt that precision in
> > approach and thinking, richness in language and naming choices, plus
> > compiler efficiency made sensitivity preferable).
>
> Talking about compiler efficiency, is there any way to write an extension
> that would allow python to be optionally strongly typed?

Python IS strongly typed.  If you mean STATICALLY typed, how
do you think an 'extension' could possibly alter the syntax of
the language, not to mention code generation &c?


Alex








More information about the Python-list mailing list