PEP 276 Simple Iterator for ints (fwd)
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
qrczak at knm.org.pl
Mon Dec 3 04:31:38 EST 2001
Mon, 3 Dec 2001 19:27:46 +1100, Delaney, Timothy <tdelaney at avaya.com> pisze:
>> I.e. it's translated to 'while' rather than to 'for i in range'.
> Definitely not. The name receiving the value from the iterator
There is no requirement to implement this as using an iterator.
> In fact, it would be impossible to do what you are suggesting unless
> you were going to have some way to inform the iterator that the
> name which received its value had been rebound.
I meant translating
for 0 <= i < 10:
i = 0
while i < 10:
i += 1
There is no iterator here.
There is another question: should the upper bound be reevaluated each
time? Again it's a silly idea to depend on that, but it should have
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk * qrczak at knm.org.pl http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/
More information about the Python-list