REPOST: Re: Python Popularity: Questions and Comments
jeff at ccvcorp.com
Fri Dec 28 13:25:36 EST 2001
Alex Martelli wrote:
> "Fredrik Juhlin" <laz at strakt.com> wrote in message
> news:mailman.1009544733.30338.python-list at python.org...
> > On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 12:27:35PM +0100, Alex Martelli wrote:
> > > "Steve Lamb" <grey at despair.dmiyu.org> wrote in message
> > > news:slrna2nhfo.nme.grey at teleute.dmiyu.org...
> > > > On Thu, 27 Dec 2001 17:48:13 +0000, phil hunt
> > > <philh at comuno.freeserve.co.uk>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Python runs quickly on my 300 MHz box, which is 3 times slower
> > > > > than the slowest PC you can buy today. It can only get more popular.
> > > >
> > > > Well, if you take the measure of just pure Mhz.... 4 times slower.
> > >
> > > FIVE or more. 1.5 GHz desktop machines are hardly news these days.
> > I'm afraid you missed the word "slowest" in the original statement, Alex
> Ooops yes -- so did Steve, I think. You CAN still buy PCs whose CPU's
> are claimed to run at 900 MHz *AND LESS* (so even the "3 times" in the
> OP was incorrect:-).
Yes, I still see quite a few 800MHz machines advertised. Of course, my place of
employment still maintains a half dozen or so machines in the 150-233 MHz
range... (and Python runs quite satisfactorily on them, too!)
========= WAS CANCELLED BY =======:
From: Jeff Shannon <jeff at ccvcorp.com>
Subject: cmsg cancel <3C2CB920.DAEA7011 at ccvcorp.com>
Control: cancel <3C2CB920.DAEA7011 at ccvcorp.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 02:58:35 GMT
Organization: A poorly-installed InterNetNews site
Message-ID: <cancel.3C2CB920.DAEA7011 at ccvcorp.com>
X-Trace: news2.kornet.net 1009775161 27193 188.8.131.52 (31 Dec 2001 05:06:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet at news2.kornet.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 05:06:01 +0000 (UTC)
X-Commentary: I love NewsAgent 1.10 and the Sandblaster Cancel Engine Build 74 (19 March 1999)
This message was cancelled from within Mozilla.
More information about the Python-list