Python 1.5.x vs Python 2.x.x
Fernando Pérez
fperez528 at yahoo.com
Tue Dec 18 18:58:36 EST 2001
Paul Rubin wrote:
> Fernando Pérez <fperez528 at yahoo.com> writes:
>> All the scripts for which this is an issue are distributed by them, as part
>> of their own system setup. So they can point every script which explicitly
>> needs 1.5 to use it.
>>
>> They cause their users a fair amount of annoyance and I have yet to
>> see a solid technical reason to justify it.
>
> IMO the annoyance was caused by the needless incompatibility between
> Python 1.5.x and 2.x.x. The redhat people had a product to ship on a
> deadline; yes they could have updated all those scripts and QA'd them
> again, but at the expense of either a schedule slip or resources being
> directed away from something else. Instead, they stuck with what
> worked. Maybe they'll update the scripts in a future Redhat release.
Well, considering that Python 2.0 was out in October 2000, the 'tight
deadline' excuse doesn't fly too well, as far as I'm concerned. As I said
above, I have yet to see a good justification for this mess. If there is one,
I'd love to hear it.
cheers,
f.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list